Stated in a 2007 press conference as D.A. for San Francisco, “we’re going to require responsible behaviors among everybody in the community; and just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn’t mean that we’re not going to walk into that home and check to see if you’re being responsible and safe in the way you conduct your affairs.”
So, she seems perfectly willing to trample on the 4th Amendment prohibiting unreasonable search and seizures. She knows you need a warrant; she just doesn’t care. Anyone who believes she is pro 2nd Amendment, as she now claims, need only look to her signing onto an Amicus Brief in the District of Columbia vs Heller. It defended a complete ban on handgun possession. It also argued against any Constitutional Right to own a firearm at all. That’s 2 Constitutionally guaranteed rights she’s perfectly willing to trample (disregard). I’m sorry, we can add the 1st Amendment as well. Remember, it’s pretty clear the current administration pressured the social media companies to suppress (censor) information counter to their story line. Mark Zuckerburg recently admitted as much to Congress.
Any politicians so ready, willing and able to trample your 1st, 2nd and 4th Amendment rights do not deserve your trust. As you’re researching candidates for this election, please keep that in mind. Then ask yourself…will their down ballot candidates support them? Or will they support your rights and the U.S. Constitution?
I will support the Constitution and your rights. Join my team and together we will solve any problems that may arise. Together, we will secure a free, prosperous future for our children and grandchildren.
Comments